← Back to Feed CACHED · 2026-07-31 01:41:03 · CACHE_KEY CVE-2026-44090
CVE-2026-44090 · CWE-306 · Disclosed 2026-07-30

Due to missing authentication

ASSESSED — NOISGATE V0.5
Vendor
Reassessed
Verdict:
Do you agree?
01 · The Real Story

Like leaving the master key to every charging station in the parking lot, hidden behind a single traffic cone

CVE-2026-44090 affects Phoenix Contact CHARX SEC-3000, SEC-3050, SEC-3100, and SEC-3150 AC EV charging controllers running firmware versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.0. The embedded MQTT broker on these devices has zero authentication. Any attacker with network access to the device can publish and subscribe to MQTT topics, gaining full read/write control of charging operations, configuration, and potentially achieving command execution when chained with companion CVEs in the same advisory batch (VDE-2026-008 documents 22 CVEs total, including CVE-2026-7849 for unauthenticated root command injection).

Phoenix Contact rates this 9.8 CRITICAL, and the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) assumes unrestricted network access. That overstates the real-world risk. The MQTT broker is not internet-facing by design — it sits behind the device's host-based firewall and should be on a segmented OT network. However, downgrading too far would be a mistake: prior research by ivision (Jesson Soto Ventura, 2025) demonstrated that the *same MQTT broker on the same device family* was trivially exploitable once reachable, and a companion CVE in this batch (CVE-2026-44108) shows the firewall can terminate prematurely during shutdown, exposing internal services. These are OT devices managing electrical infrastructure, and the blast radius includes charging disruption, billing manipulation, and potential lateral movement to OCPP backends.

"Unauthenticated MQTT on EV charger controllers — one firewall rule from full device compromise"
02 · The Attack Path

4 steps from start to impact.

STEP 01

Gain network adjacency to CHARX controller

The attacker must reach the CHARX controller's LAN interface. This could happen via a misconfigured network, compromised adjacent device on the OT VLAN, physical access to the charging station's Ethernet port, or exploitation of CVE-2026-44108 (firewall premature termination during shutdown). The 4G modem on SEC-3050/3150 models adds another potential path if the cellular APN is misconfigured.
Conditions required:
  • Network adjacency to the CHARX controller LAN interface
  • Firewall not blocking MQTT port (1883) OR firewall terminated (CVE-2026-44108)
Where this breaks in practice:
  • Devices are designed to sit behind firewalls on segmented OT networks
  • Physical access to charging station internals requires tampering with locked enclosures
  • Cellular interface is typically configured for outbound OCPP only
Detection/coverage: Network scanning for open port 1883 on OT segments. Shodan/Censys scans show minimal internet-exposed CHARX devices.
STEP 02

Connect to unauthenticated MQTT broker

With network access, the attacker connects to the MQTT broker on port 1883 using any standard MQTT client (e.g., mosquitto_sub, mqtt-cli, or Python paho-mqtt). No credentials are required — the broker accepts all connections. The attacker subscribes to wildcard topic # to enumerate all active topics and observe charging state, configuration, and metering data.
Conditions required:
  • TCP connectivity to port 1883 on the CHARX device
Where this breaks in practice:
  • None — once network access is achieved, the broker is wide open
Detection/coverage: MQTT connection logs if enabled; IDS signatures for wildcard MQTT subscriptions on OT networks.
STEP 03

Manipulate charging operations via MQTT publish

The attacker publishes crafted MQTT messages to control topics, enabling them to start/stop charging sessions, alter metering values (relevant for German Eichrecht/calibration law compliance), modify OCPP backend configuration (CVE-2026-44101), or trigger denial of service. Prior ivision research demonstrated crash-inducing payloads via malformed JSON on topology topics.
Conditions required:
  • Active MQTT session from Step 2
Where this breaks in practice:
  • Attacker needs knowledge of CHARX MQTT topic structure (documented in manuals and prior research)
Detection/coverage: Anomalous MQTT publish patterns; charging session logs showing unauthorized start/stop events.
STEP 04

Chain to root command execution

If combined with CVE-2026-7849 (unauthenticated command injection as root, also CVSS 9.8 in the same firmware), the attacker pivots from MQTT access to full root shell on the embedded Linux system. The 2025 ivision research demonstrated a similar chain: MQTT access → memory corruption → code execution, with ASLR bypass feasible via ARM32 brute-force (256 possible offsets).
Conditions required:
  • Vulnerable firmware < 1.9.1 (which addresses all 22 CVEs)
  • Companion CVE-2026-7849 present (same affected version range)
Where this breaks in practice:
  • Requires exploitation skill for command injection chaining
  • ARM32 binary exploitation is niche but well-documented
Detection/coverage: Process execution monitoring on embedded Linux; unexpected outbound connections from CHARX devices.
03 · Intelligence Metadata

The supporting signals.

In-the-Wild ExploitationNo confirmed in-the-wild exploitation. Not listed in CISA KEV. However, prior CHARX MQTT vulnerabilities (CVE-2025-24002 through CVE-2025-24006) were publicly disclosed with PoC in September 2025 by ivision research.
Proof-of-ConceptNo public PoC specific to CVE-2026-44090, but exploitation is trivial — connect any MQTT client to port 1883 with no credentials. Prior PoC for same device family: Jessonsotoventura/charx-sec-exploits on GitHub.
EPSS Score0.00401 (0.4%) — low probability of exploitation in the next 30 days. Typical for OT/ICS CVEs with limited internet exposure.
KEV StatusNot listed as of 2026-07-31.
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H (9.8). Also scored CVSS 4.0: 9.3. The AV:N assumes direct network reachability, which overstates exposure for firewall-protected OT devices.
Affected VersionsPhoenix Contact CHARX SEC-3000, SEC-3050, SEC-3100, SEC-3150 — all firmware versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.0.
Fixed VersionFirmware 1.9.1, available no later than August 12, 2026 per CERT@VDE advisory VDE-2026-008.
Scanning/ExposureNo significant internet-facing exposure observed on Shodan/Censys for CHARX devices. These are embedded controllers in EV charging stations, typically on private OT networks or behind NAT. The 4G modem (SEC-3050/3150) is outbound-only by default.
Disclosure Date2026-07-30, published by CERT@VDE as part of advisory VDE-2026-008 covering 22 CVEs.
ReporterCredited via CERT@VDE. Prior related research by Jesson Soto Ventura (ivision Research) disclosed in 2025.
04 · The Call

noisgate verdict.

Final Verdict
DOWNGRADED to HIGH (7.5/10)

The single most decisive factor is firewall-gated network access — the MQTT broker is architecturally protected from external reach, requiring local network adjacency or firewall failure (CVE-2026-44108) to exploit. However, the OT device role (EV charging infrastructure) with a trivially exploitable missing-auth flaw and 22-CVE chain potential floors this at HIGH despite the access friction.

HIGH Vulnerability existence and technical mechanism (confirmed by CERT@VDE and NVD)
MEDIUM Real-world exposure population (limited Shodan data for CHARX devices)
HIGH Exploitability once network access achieved (zero authentication, prior PoC on same device family)

Why this verdict

  • Firewall dependency reduces effective attack surface. The MQTT broker is not internet-facing by design. The vendor explicitly states protection relies on firewall rules, and the device is intended for segmented OT networks. This makes the AV:N vector misleading for most deployments — effective access is closer to AV:A (adjacent). Adjustment: -1.5 from baseline.
  • Companion CVE weakens the firewall assumption. CVE-2026-44108 (firewall premature termination during shutdown) in the same advisory batch means the firewall protection is not absolute. During device restarts or firmware updates, the MQTT broker may be transiently exposed. This partially offsets the firewall friction. Adjustment: +0.5 back.
  • Prior PoC on identical attack surface. ivision Research (2025) demonstrated full exploitation of the same unauthenticated MQTT broker on the same CHARX hardware, including memory corruption and privilege escalation. The attack surface is well-understood and tooling exists. Adjustment: +0.2.
  • Role multiplier: OT/EV charging infrastructure. (a) *Low-value role*: lab/test charger — MEDIUM impact, isolated. (b) *Typical role*: commercial parking lot charger — operational disruption, billing fraud, denial of charging service. (c) *High-value role*: fleet charging depot, highway rest-stop infrastructure, or utility-managed charging network — disruption of transportation infrastructure, potential pivot to OCPP billing backends, Eichrecht compliance violations. The chain succeeds in the high-value role with blast radius of operational disruption across managed charging sites. EV chargers are OT devices per the high-value role catalog. However, the blast radius is operational (charging disruption) rather than fleet-scale IT compromise or safety-critical. Floor: HIGH.
  • EPSS confirms low near-term exploitation probability. At 0.4%, this sits in the bottom quartile. OT/ICS CVEs historically have low EPSS but high consequence when exploited. No weight change, but informs patching urgency.

Why not higher?

CRITICAL would require either active exploitation (not observed), direct internet exposure (not the case — firewall-protected by architecture), or safety-critical OT impact (EV chargers cause service disruption, not physical safety hazards like PLC/SCADA controllers in industrial processes). The companion firewall CVE creates transient exposure windows, not persistent ones. The installed base of internet-reachable CHARX devices appears negligible per scanning data.

Why not lower?

MEDIUM would undervalue the OT device role and the zero-friction exploitation once network access is achieved. The complete absence of authentication on a critical control interface is a fundamental design failure, not a configuration oversight. The 22-CVE batch (including root command injection) means MQTT access is a gateway to full device compromise. Prior research with public PoC on the same hardware demonstrates this is not theoretical. The OT floor rule applies: EV charging controllers are in the OT/ICS catalog, and operational disruption at scale is plausible.

05 · Compensating Control

What to do — in priority order.

  1. Isolate CHARX controllers on a dedicated OT VLAN with explicit allow-list firewall rules — The MQTT broker has no authentication — network segmentation IS the authentication. Ensure no IT hosts, guest networks, or user devices can reach port 1883 on CHARX controllers. Deploy within 30 days per noisgate mitigation SLA for HIGH.
  2. Block TCP port 1883 (and 8883 if TLS MQTT is configured) at the network boundary — Add explicit deny rules on upstream switches/firewalls for MQTT ports to/from CHARX devices except authorized management stations. This is a 15-minute change that eliminates the attack surface from non-adjacent networks.
  3. Monitor for unauthorized MQTT connections to CHARX devices — Deploy IDS rules (Suricata/Zeek) on the OT network segment to alert on any MQTT CONNECT packets to CHARX controller IPs from unauthorized sources. MQTT protocol dissectors are mature in both tools.
  4. Disable unnecessary services pending firmware update — If the CHARX web interface allows it, disable the Eichrecht agent and any non-essential MQTT-consuming services to reduce the attack surface from companion CVEs (CVE-2026-7849 command injection).
  5. Schedule firmware 1.9.1 deployment for August 12-15, 2026 — Firmware 1.9.1 patches all 22 CVEs. Phoenix Contact has committed to availability by August 12. Plan a maintenance window within the first week of availability. Test on a non-production charger first.
What doesn't work
  • TLS on MQTT (port 8883) does not help — the issue is missing *authentication*, not missing encryption. TLS without client certificate verification still allows any client to connect.
  • WAF/reverse proxy in front of MQTT is not practical — MQTT is a binary protocol, not HTTP. Standard WAFs cannot inspect or filter MQTT traffic meaningfully.
  • Changing the MQTT port number provides zero security benefit — any network scan will find the relocated service in seconds.
06 · Verification

Crowdsourced verification payload.

Run this script from any Linux/macOS host on the same network segment as the CHARX controller. Requires mosquitto_sub (from the mosquitto-clients package). Usage: bash check_charx_mqtt.sh 192.168.1.100 where the argument is the CHARX controller IP. No special privileges required.

noisgate-verify.sh
BASHREAD-ONLYSAFE
#!/bin/bash
# check_charx_mqtt.sh - Verify CVE-2026-44090 (unauthenticated MQTT on Phoenix Contact CHARX)
# Usage: bash check_charx_mqtt.sh <CHARX_IP>
# Requires: mosquitto_sub (apt install mosquitto-clients / brew install mosquitto)
# Exit codes: 0=VULNERABLE, 1=PATCHED, 2=UNKNOWN

set -euo pipefail

TARGET="${1:-}"
PORT=1883
TIMEOUT=5

if [ -z "$TARGET" ]; then
  echo "Usage: $0 <CHARX_CONTROLLER_IP>"
  exit 2
fi

if ! command -v mosquitto_sub &>/dev/null; then
  echo "UNKNOWN - mosquitto_sub not found. Install mosquitto-clients."
  exit 2
fi

# Attempt unauthenticated MQTT connection and subscribe to wildcard for a few seconds
echo "[*] Testing unauthenticated MQTT connection to $TARGET:$PORT ..."

OUTPUT=$(timeout "$TIMEOUT" mosquitto_sub -h "$TARGET" -p "$PORT" -t '#' -C 1 -W "$TIMEOUT" 2>&1) && RC=$? || RC=$?

if [ $RC -eq 0 ] || echo "$OUTPUT" | grep -qi 'received\|connected\|publish'; then
  echo "VULNERABLE - Unauthenticated MQTT connection succeeded on $TARGET:$PORT"
  echo "CVE-2026-44090: MQTT broker accepts connections without authentication."
  echo "Received data: $OUTPUT"
  exit 0
elif echo "$OUTPUT" | grep -qi 'refused\|not authorized\|auth\|forbidden'; then
  echo "PATCHED - MQTT broker on $TARGET:$PORT requires authentication."
  exit 1
elif echo "$OUTPUT" | grep -qi 'Connection timed out\|No route\|Network is unreachable'; then
  echo "UNKNOWN - Cannot reach $TARGET:$PORT (firewall or host down)."
  exit 2
else
  # Timeout with no data could mean connected but no messages, or blocked
  # Try a simple connection test
  CONN_TEST=$(timeout "$TIMEOUT" mosquitto_sub -h "$TARGET" -p "$PORT" -t 'test/noisgate' -W 2 2>&1) && CRC=$? || CRC=$?
  if echo "$CONN_TEST" | grep -qi 'refused\|not authorized\|auth'; then
    echo "PATCHED - MQTT broker on $TARGET:$PORT requires authentication."
    exit 1
  elif [ $CRC -eq 27 ] || [ $CRC -eq 0 ]; then
    echo "VULNERABLE - Unauthenticated MQTT connection accepted (no messages in window, but broker allowed session)."
    exit 0
  else
    echo "UNKNOWN - Inconclusive result (exit code: $CRC). Output: $CONN_TEST"
    exit 2
  fi
fi
07 · Bottom Line

If you remember one thing.

TL;DR
Monday morning action plan: CVE-2026-44090 is reassessed as HIGH (7.5) — not the vendor's CRITICAL 9.8, but still urgent for any organization operating Phoenix Contact CHARX SEC-3xxx EV charging controllers. Immediately verify that all CHARX controllers are on segmented OT VLANs with port 1883 blocked from non-authorized hosts — this is your compensating control and should be confirmed within 30 days per the noisgate mitigation SLA. Firmware 1.9.1 drops August 12; schedule deployment for the week of August 12-15 and complete fleet-wide remediation within the 180-day noisgate remediation SLA (by January 2027). If you have any CHARX devices reachable from corporate IT networks or — worse — the internet, treat those as emergency patches: isolate immediately and update the moment 1.9.1 is available. This is not KEV-listed and EPSS is low (0.4%), so mass exploitation is unlikely, but the complete absence of MQTT authentication on an OT device is a design-level failure that cannot be left unmitigated.

Sources

  1. NVD - CVE-2026-44090
  2. CERT@VDE Advisory VDE-2026-008
  3. ivision Research - CHARX SEC-3150 Exploitation
  4. Phoenix Contact CHARX SEC-3150 Product Page
  5. runZero - Phoenix Contact Vulnerability Asset Discovery
  6. CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog
  7. FIRST EPSS
Peer Review

What defenders are saying.

Submit a review attribution: handle + country only
0 flags selected · stored anonymously
Validation Results

Crowdsourced verification outputs.

Results submitted by users who ran the verification payload against their environment.