← Back to Feed CACHED · 2026-05-17 09:42:19 · cache_key CVE-2025-29912
tenable:193419 · CWE-125 · Disclosed 2023-10-19

Apache 2

ASSESSED — NOISGATE V0.5
Vendor
Reassessed
Verdict:
01 · The Real Story

This is a nick in the spare key hanging in the server room, not a broken front-door lock

CVE-2023-31122 is an out-of-bounds read in Apache HTTP Server's mod_macro, affecting upstream Apache httpd through 2.4.57 and fixed in 2.4.58. mod_macro is a configuration macro-expansion module: Apache's own docs say macros are expanded *when the server starts up*, so this bug lives in config parsing rather than normal request handling. If mod_macro is not loaded, this CVE does not apply.

The vendor-vs-reality gap is wide here. NVD scored it 7.5/HIGH with a generic network-DoS vector, but Apache itself labeled it low, and that is much closer to operational truth: an attacker usually needs more than raw HTTP reachability to matter here, because they must get Apache to parse attacker-controlled macro content in config or .htaccess-like paths first. For most enterprises, that means this is post-compromise or tenant-misconfiguration territory, not a clean unauthenticated internet exploit.

"This is a config-parser edge case in mod_macro, not a realistic internet-facing Apache fire drill."
02 · The Attack Path

4 steps from start to impact.

STEP 01

Find old Apache versions with Nessus or banner scans

An attacker or scanner can identify Apache instances reporting versions older than 2.4.58 using banner checks, package inventory, or plugins like Tenable 193419. This is the easy part, but it only proves version age, not whether mod_macro is loaded or whether the vulnerable parsing path is attacker-reachable.
Conditions required:
  • Apache httpd version through 2.4.57
  • Some form of version disclosure or package visibility
Where this breaks in practice:
  • Version-only detection overstates exposure because the CVE is in mod_macro, not the core request path
  • Backported distro fixes and hidden banners reduce accuracy
Detection/coverage: Excellent version-based coverage from Nessus/NVD-style checks; poor coverage for actual exploitability because scanners usually cannot prove mod_macro is loaded.
STEP 02

Confirm mod_macro is actually loaded

The flaw sits in mod_macro, so the next step is verifying that the module is enabled in the live Apache runtime or reachable configuration set. Apache's module documentation makes clear this component exists to expand macros inside configuration files, not to process ordinary web requests.
Conditions required:
  • mod_macro loaded in Apache
  • Access to runtime module list, package metadata, or config files
Where this breaks in practice:
  • External attackers usually cannot tell whether mod_macro is enabled
  • Many enterprises never use mod_macro at all
Detection/coverage: Host-based checks (apachectl -M, httpd -M, config review) work well; network scanners generally cannot validate module presence.
STEP 03

Reach a config parsing path with attacker-controlled macro content

To move from 'old version' to 'actual bug trigger,' the attacker has to make Apache parse crafted macro directives. Because Apache documents macro expansion at startup/config processing time, this usually implies the attacker can edit server config, drop a malicious include, or place a dangerous .htaccess-style file where overrides are allowed and later parsed.
Conditions required:
  • Ability to write or influence Apache configuration content
  • Apache parsing event such as restart, reload, or request-time .htaccess handling
Where this breaks in practice:
  • This is not a plain HTTP request bug
  • Requiring config write or equivalent strongly implies prior compromise, delegated admin, or risky shared-hosting design
  • Modern EDR/FIM/privilege controls should catch config tampering first
Detection/coverage: Good opportunity for file integrity monitoring, EDR, auditd, and config management drift detection; weak network-side detection.
STEP 04

Crash or over-read inside Apache process

If the vulnerable parser path is reached, the practical outcome is process instability or denial of service consistent with NVD's A:H and no integrity/confidentiality impact. There is no authoritative evidence here of clean pre-auth remote code execution or broad in-the-wild weaponization.
Conditions required:
  • Successful parser trigger in vulnerable mod_macro code
  • Apache process handling the crafted macro input
Where this breaks in practice:
  • Impact is limited versus code-exec-class server bugs
  • Requires several narrowing prerequisites before the bug even matters
Detection/coverage: Apache error logs, service crashes, core dumps, and watchdog restarts can reveal impact; exposure validation remains harder than impact detection.
03 · Intelligence Metadata

The supporting signals.

In-the-wild statusNo public evidence of active exploitation found. CISA's Vulnrichment record shows Exploitation: none, and the CVE is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog page reviewed.
Proof-of-concept availabilityNo authoritative public PoC stood out. Search noise exists in aggregator sites, but I did not find a trusted Apache-authored reproducer or a widely cited offensive PoC worth treating as operationally significant.
EPSSBitsight currently displays EPSS 0.4 at the 61st percentile for CVE-2023-31122; treat that as modest signal, not proof of imminent exploitation.
KEV statusNot in CISA KEV based on the CISA KEV catalog page reviewed; no federal due date applies.
CVSSCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H = 7.5/HIGH at NVD, but that vector assumes internet reachability that the real attack chain does not cleanly support.
Affected rangeUpstream Apache HTTP Server through 2.4.57; Apache describes it as mod_macro only.
Fixed versionsUpstream fix is 2.4.58. Debian LTS backported fixes in 2.4.59-1~deb10u1 for Debian 10 apache2.
Exposure realityBitsight shows 246,814 public observations of Apache 2.4.57 and 5,499,646 observations tied to the CVE, but those are internet-scale version observations and do not prove mod_macro is enabled.
Disclosure timelineApache released 2.4.58 on 2023-10-19 and NVD published the CVE on 2023-10-23. Openwall lists the report timeline as 2023-04-04 to Apache security.
ReporterReported by David Shoon (github/davidshoon) per Apache/Openwall.
04 · The Call

noisgate verdict.

Final Verdict
DOWNGRADED to LOW (2.8/10)

The decisive factor is attacker position: this bug is in a configuration macro parser, so real exploitation usually requires config influence or another foothold before Apache ever touches malicious input. That sharply cuts the exposed population compared with a true request-path Apache bug, so a LOW rating is the right operational bucket.

HIGH Downgrade from generic NVD/Tenable severity to practitioner severity
MEDIUM Exact prevalence of `mod_macro` usage in enterprise fleets

Why this verdict

  • Config-parser, not request-parser: Apache documents mod_macro expansion at startup/config processing time, which breaks the usual 'send one HTTP request from the internet' assumption behind the 7.5 score.
  • Requires narrower attacker position: to matter in real life, the attacker typically needs config write/influence, .htaccess control, or equivalent delegated admin access. That implies post-initial-access or a special hosting model, which is strong downward pressure on severity.
  • Population is much smaller than Apache-at-large: internet scanning can find old Apache versions, but it generally cannot prove mod_macro is enabled. That makes the truly reachable population much smaller than the visible banner population.

Why not higher?

There is no solid evidence here of unauthenticated remote code execution, no KEV listing, and no trustworthy sign of broad exploitation campaigns. The biggest reason not to go higher is that raw network access to port 80/443 is usually insufficient by itself.

Why not lower?

It is still a real memory-safety bug in a widely deployed product family, and some environments do let untrusted users influence Apache config fragments or .htaccess. If you run shared hosting, delegated web content management, or permissive override models, the risk is non-zero and worth cleaning up.

05 · Compensating Control

What to do — in priority order.

  1. Inventory mod_macro usage — Identify which Apache nodes actually load macro_module and document where macros are used. For a LOW verdict there is no SLA (treat as backlog hygiene), but do this in the next routine audit so you can sharply reduce false-positive exposure.
  2. Lock down config write paths — Restrict write access to Apache configs, included snippets, and web roots that can carry .htaccess files; alert on drift with FIM or EDR. For a LOW verdict there is no SLA (treat as backlog hygiene), but this control matters more than rushing a fleet-wide emergency patch.
  3. Reduce override usage — Where possible, disable or narrowly scope AllowOverride so untrusted content paths cannot introduce Apache directives that must be parsed at request time. For a LOW verdict there is no SLA (treat as backlog hygiene) and this is mainly about shrinking reachability.
What doesn't work
  • A generic WAF does not solve this well, because the bug is not primarily a normal request-routing flaw in Apache's front-door traffic path.
  • Internet-facing banner hiding does not materially reduce risk; it only makes scanner output noisier without removing the underlying config-parser condition.
  • Treating every Apache <2.4.58 host as equally urgent does not work, because many won't have mod_macro enabled and some distros backport fixes.
06 · Verification

Crowdsourced verification payload.

Run this on the target Apache host as a local administrator or with sudo, because it reads runtime module state and package metadata. Example: sudo bash check_cve_2023_31122.sh; it needs enough privilege to run apachectl -M/httpd -M and query the package manager.

noisgate-verify.sh
BASHREAD-ONLYSAFE
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# check_cve_2023_31122.sh
# Determine likely exposure to CVE-2023-31122 (Apache mod_macro buffer over-read)
# Output: VULNERABLE / PATCHED / UNKNOWN
# Exit codes: 0=PATCHED, 1=VULNERABLE, 2=UNKNOWN

set -u

fixed_upstream="2.4.58"
status="UNKNOWN"
reason=""
ctl=""
mod_output=""
server_version=""
pkg_info=""

have_cmd() { command -v "$1" >/dev/null 2>&1; }

ver_ge() {
  # returns 0 if $1 >= $2
  [ "$(printf '%s\n%s\n' "$2" "$1" | sort -V | head -n1)" = "$2" ]
}

find_ctl() {
  for c in apache2ctl apachectl httpd; do
    if have_cmd "$c"; then
      ctl="$c"
      return 0
    fi
  done
  return 1
}

get_server_version() {
  local out=""
  if [ -n "$ctl" ]; then
    out="$($ctl -v 2>/dev/null || true)"
    server_version="$(printf '%s' "$out" | sed -n 's/.*Apache\/\([0-9][0-9.]*\).*/\1/p' | head -n1)"
  fi
}

get_module_list() {
  if [ -n "$ctl" ]; then
    mod_output="$($ctl -M 2>/dev/null || true)"
  fi
}

get_pkg_info() {
  if have_cmd dpkg-query; then
    pkg_info="$(dpkg-query -W -f='${Package} ${Version}\n' apache2 apache2-bin 2>/dev/null || true)"
  elif have_cmd rpm; then
    pkg_info="$(rpm -q httpd apache2 2>/dev/null || true)"
  fi
}

package_has_fixed_backport() {
  # Known fixed Debian LTS package from advisory
  printf '%s\n' "$pkg_info" | grep -Eq 'apache2(\-bin)? 2\.4\.59-1~deb10u1' && return 0
  return 1
}

main() {
  find_ctl || true
  get_server_version
  get_module_list
  get_pkg_info

  if package_has_fixed_backport; then
    echo "PATCHED - package backport detected ($pkg_info)"
    exit 0
  fi

  if [ -z "$mod_output" ]; then
    echo "UNKNOWN - could not retrieve loaded Apache modules"
    exit 2
  fi

  if ! printf '%s\n' "$mod_output" | grep -Eq 'macro_module'; then
    echo "PATCHED - mod_macro is not loaded, CVE-2023-31122 does not apply"
    exit 0
  fi

  if [ -z "$server_version" ]; then
    echo "UNKNOWN - mod_macro is loaded but Apache version could not be determined"
    exit 2
  fi

  if ver_ge "$server_version" "$fixed_upstream"; then
    echo "PATCHED - Apache $server_version with mod_macro loaded is at or above $fixed_upstream"
    exit 0
  fi

  echo "VULNERABLE - Apache $server_version is below $fixed_upstream and mod_macro is loaded"
  exit 1
}

main "$@"
07 · Bottom Line

If you remember one thing.

TL;DR
Monday morning: do not let Tenable 193419 jump the queue ahead of remotely reachable Apache request-path bugs. First, identify which hosts actually load mod_macro; if they do not, close or downgrade the finding. For the remainder, fold patching into normal maintenance: for a LOW verdict there is no noisgate mitigation SLA and noisgate remediation SLA is no SLA (treat as backlog hygiene). If you discover shared-hosting, delegated .htaccess, or config-write workflows that let untrusted users influence Apache directives, tighten those controls in the same maintenance cycle and patch the affected subset in routine change windows.

Sources

  1. Apache HTTP Server 2.4 vulnerabilities
  2. NVD CVE-2023-31122
  3. Openwall oss-security post for CVE-2023-31122
  4. Apache mod_macro documentation
  5. Debian LTS advisory DLA-3818-1
  6. CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog
  7. Bitsight CVE-2023-31122 observation footprint
  8. Bitsight Apache HTTP Server 2.4.57 observation footprint
Peer Review

What defenders are saying.

Submit a review attribution: handle + country only
0 flags selected · stored anonymously
Validation Results

Crowdsourced verification outputs.

Results submitted by users who ran the verification payload against their environment.