← Back to Feed CACHED · 2026-07-23 03:11:37 · CACHE_KEY tenable:240850
tenable:240850 · CWE-20 · Disclosed 2025-06-27

Grafana Labs < 11

ASSESSED — NOISGATE V0.5
Vendor
Reassessed
Verdict:
Do you agree?
01 · The Real Story

An authenticated user types a comically long dashboard title and their own browser tab freezes

CVE-2025-1088 is an improper input validation issue in Grafana affecting versions prior to 11.6.2. When an authenticated user with dashboard-editing privileges saves a dashboard with an *excessively long title or panel name*, Chromium-based browsers rendering that dashboard become unresponsive. There is no server-side crash, no code execution, no data exposure — the impact is confined to the client-side rendering engine of whoever subsequently loads the dashboard.

Vendor severity is MEDIUM in Tenable's plugin catalog but the upstream CVSS is 2.7 (LOW). Reality tracks the upstream number, not the plugin bucket. The chain requires an authenticated Editor role, targets only browser responsiveness (kill-tab recovers), and has no lateral or persistence value. Calling this MEDIUM overstates it; it is textbook backlog hygiene.

"Client-side browser DoS requiring an authenticated Editor. Vendor MEDIUM is generous — this is LOW at best."
02 · The Attack Path

3 steps from start to impact.

STEP 01

Attacker obtains Editor-role credentials in Grafana

The vulnerable action is Save Dashboard / Save Panel, which is gated behind the Editor or Admin role in Grafana's org RBAC model. Anonymous or Viewer accounts cannot reach the code path. In practice this means the attacker is already a trusted internal user or has phished/stolen a workforce credential and passed any SSO / MFA in front of Grafana.
Conditions required:
  • Valid Grafana account with Editor+ role in at least one org/folder
  • Network reachability to the Grafana UI
Where this breaks in practice:
  • Editor role is not handed out to random users in mature deployments
  • SSO + MFA in front of Grafana blocks credential stuffing
  • Audit log records the dashboard save with actor identity
Detection/coverage: Grafana audit log captures dashboard version create; no Nessus/Qualys DAST signature for the crafted title itself.
STEP 02

Save dashboard with a pathologically long title/panel name

Attacker uses the Grafana HTTP API (POST /api/dashboards/db) or UI to write a title string in the multi-megabyte range. No public weaponized tool exists — a two-line curl with a Python-generated payload is sufficient. The server accepts and persists it because input length validation is the missing control.
Conditions required:
  • Editor session or API token
  • Ability to invent a title beyond the browser's practical DOM/layout budget
Where this breaks in practice:
  • WAF rules on request body size may truncate the payload
  • Grafana quotas on dashboard count / folder ACLs limit scope
Detection/coverage: Anomalous request body size on /api/dashboards/db is trivially alertable in an access log.
STEP 03

Victim loads the poisoned dashboard, browser tab hangs

When any user navigates to the dashboard, Chromium attempts to lay out and render the oversized string, consuming CPU and locking the tab. The victim closes the tab or Chromium's own hung-tab watchdog kills it. There is no impact on the Grafana server, other dashboards, or other users who don't open the poisoned board.
Conditions required:
  • Victim navigates to the crafted dashboard
  • Victim uses a Chromium-based browser
Where this breaks in practice:
  • Tab-scoped impact only — no session, cookie, or credential compromise
  • Users learn quickly to avoid or delete the offending dashboard
  • Admin can DELETE /api/dashboards/uid/:uid in seconds
Detection/coverage: No detection needed — the symptom is the alert. Users report it.
03 · Intelligence Metadata

The supporting signals.

CVECVE-2025-1088 — Grafana improper input validation (long dashboard title/panel name)
CWECWE-20 Improper Input Validation (client-side DoS)
CVSS v3.1 (upstream)2.7 LOWAV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Tenable plugin bucketMEDIUM (240850) — inconsistent with the upstream 2.7 score
KEV statusNot listed in CISA KEV
EPSSNegligible (<0.05% / <5th percentile) — no exploitation activity
Exploit PoCNo public weaponized exploit; trivial to reproduce with curl + long string. No Metasploit/Nuclei template.
Affected versionsAll Grafana OSS/Enterprise < 11.6.2
Fixed versionsGrafana 11.6.2+; distro backports: RHSA-2025:0662 (RHEL 9), ALSA-2025:8666 (AlmaLinux 10), RLSA-2025:8666 (Rocky 10)
ExposureShodan shows ~110k public Grafana instances, but exploitation requires an authenticated Editor — public exposure is not the risk axis
Disclosure / reporterDisclosed via Grafana Labs security advisory, GHSA-crvv-6w6h-cv34
04 · The Call

noisgate verdict.

Final Verdict
DOWNGRADED to LOW (2.5/10)

The single decisive factor is impact scope: authenticated Editor + client-side tab freeze with no server, data, or session impact. There is no confidentiality or integrity loss, availability loss is limited to one browser tab of one user who chooses to open the dashboard, and the vulnerable action is already audit-logged and reversible with a single API call.

HIGH Impact ceiling (client-side tab hang, no server impact)
HIGH Prerequisite (Editor role required)
MEDIUM Exploitation-in-the-wild status — none observed, but PoC is trivial

Why this verdict

  • Privilege gate: requires an authenticated Editor+ role — an attacker who already has this can trash dashboards, exfil query results, and abuse datasource proxying in ways far more damaging than a tab hang.
  • Impact ceiling: confidentiality = none, integrity = none, availability = one victim tab per navigation event. Server keeps serving.
  • Role multiplier: Grafana is typically a *monitoring dashboard tier* — high-visibility but not identity, PKI, hypervisor, or backup infrastructure. Even in the worst deployment role (NOC wallboard) the outcome is a frozen wallboard, not fleet compromise. No role-based floor is triggered.
  • No KEV, negligible EPSS, no weaponization — this is not on any adversary's target list.
  • Tenable's MEDIUM label conflicts with the upstream CVSS 2.7 LOW — trust the vector, not the bucket.

Why not higher?

MEDIUM would imply meaningful production impact or a plausible pivot. Neither exists: no code execution, no data disclosure, no session takeover, and the trigger requires the exact privilege (Editor) that already allows the attacker to do worse things with legitimate features.

Why not lower?

IGNORE would be wrong because the fix is free (upgrade to 11.6.2, already shipped in distro backports) and leaving unpatched Grafana on the estate creates version drift that complicates future response. It's real work-item hygiene, just not urgent.

05 · Compensating Control

What to do — in priority order.

  1. Audit and prune Editor/Admin role assignments — Grafana orgs frequently accumulate stale Editors from onboarding scripts. Removing Editor from users who only need Viewer eliminates the population that can trigger this bug — do this as part of quarterly access review, no mitigation SLA required for LOW.
  2. Enforce SSO + MFA on Grafana — Prevents credential-stuffed access to Editor accounts; align with your existing IdP standards, no mitigation SLA for LOW — treat as baseline hardening.
  3. Add a WAF/reverse-proxy request-body size cap in front of Grafana — A 1 MB body cap on /api/dashboards/db blocks the pathological payload without affecting real dashboards. Configure on the fronting nginx/HAProxy/ALB during your next routine change window.
  4. Upgrade Grafana to 11.6.2+ (or apply RHSA-2025:0662 / ALSA-2025:8666 / RLSA-2025:8666) — The real fix. Roll through the standard patch train — noisgate remediation SLA for LOW is backlog, target the next scheduled Grafana upgrade cycle.
What doesn't work
  • Network-layer IDS/IPS signatures — the payload is JSON with a legitimate title field, indistinguishable from normal traffic without size heuristics
  • Blocking anonymous access — the bug requires *authenticated* Editors, so anonymous hardening does nothing here
  • Browser hardening on end-user endpoints — the Chromium hang is expected behavior on any oversized DOM string; nothing to configure client-side
06 · Verification

Crowdsourced verification payload.

Run on an *auditor workstation* with network reach and a Grafana API token (Viewer role is enough — this only reads /api/health). Invoke: GRAFANA_URL=https://grafana.example.com GRAFANA_TOKEN=glsa_xxx ./check_cve_2025_1088.sh. No elevated privileges needed on the Grafana host.

noisgate-verify.sh
BASHREAD-ONLYSAFE
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# check_cve_2025_1088.sh — determine if a Grafana instance is exposed to CVE-2025-1088
# Exit codes: 0 PATCHED, 1 VULNERABLE, 2 UNKNOWN
set -u

: "${GRAFANA_URL:?Set GRAFANA_URL, e.g. https://grafana.example.com}"
: "${GRAFANA_TOKEN:?Set GRAFANA_TOKEN (Viewer-role service account token is sufficient)}"

FIXED_MAJOR=11
FIXED_MINOR=6
FIXED_PATCH=2

resp=$(curl -sS -k -H "Authorization: Bearer ${GRAFANA_TOKEN}" "${GRAFANA_URL%/}/api/health" || true)
if [ -z "$resp" ]; then
  echo "UNKNOWN: no response from ${GRAFANA_URL}/api/health"
  exit 2
fi

version=$(printf '%s' "$resp" | sed -n 's/.*"version"[[:space:]]*:[[:space:]]*"\([^"]*\)".*/\1/p')
if [ -z "$version" ]; then
  echo "UNKNOWN: could not parse version from health endpoint"
  exit 2
fi

# Strip pre-release / build metadata
core=${version%%-*}
core=${core%%+*}
IFS='.' read -r maj min pat <<< "$core"
maj=${maj:-0}; min=${min:-0}; pat=${pat:-0}

vuln=0
if [ "$maj" -lt "$FIXED_MAJOR" ]; then vuln=1
elif [ "$maj" -eq "$FIXED_MAJOR" ] && [ "$min" -lt "$FIXED_MINOR" ]; then vuln=1
elif [ "$maj" -eq "$FIXED_MAJOR" ] && [ "$min" -eq "$FIXED_MINOR" ] && [ "$pat" -lt "$FIXED_PATCH" ]; then vuln=1
fi

if [ "$vuln" -eq 1 ]; then
  echo "VULNERABLE: Grafana ${version} < 11.6.2 (CVE-2025-1088)"
  exit 1
fi

echo "PATCHED: Grafana ${version} >= 11.6.2"
exit 0
07 · Bottom Line

If you remember one thing.

TL;DR
Do not lose sleep over this one. Verdict is LOW (reassessed 2.5) — noisgate mitigation SLA is *not applicable* for LOW, so skip inventing an emergency window and go straight to the noisgate remediation SLA of ≤365 days: fold Grafana 11.6.2+ into your normal quarterly upgrade train. Monday morning, run the verification script across your Grafana estate to identify unpatched instances, and if you happen to front Grafana with nginx/HAProxy add a 1 MB request-body cap on /api/dashboards/db as a free hardening win. Spend the calendar time you'd have burned on this ticket auditing Editor-role assignments instead — that pays back on many bugs, not just this one.

Sources

  1. Tenable plugin 240850
  2. NVD — CVE-2025-1088
  3. GitHub Advisory GHSA-crvv-6w6h-cv34
  4. SentinelOne vulnerability entry
  5. Snyk — Improper Input Validation in grafana-loki
  6. CVE Details — CVE-2025-1088
  7. GitLab Advisory Database
  8. Amazon Linux ALAS — CVE-2025-1088
Peer Review

What defenders are saying.

Submit a review attribution: handle + country only
0 flags selected · stored anonymously
Validation Results

Crowdsourced verification outputs.

Results submitted by users who ran the verification payload against their environment.